Prostate Cancer Radiation: Is Never An Easy Decision

Choosing the type of Prostate Radiation therapy to get is not an easy decision, and the right approach depends heavily on the characteristics of your disease, your age and overall health, and your willingness to accept different types of risk.

---

Key Considerations in Choosing a Radiation Strategy

• Radiation is usually a “one-shot” deal: Once a full course of radiation is completed, re-irradiation in the same area is rarely safe due to potential tissue damage, such as rectal fistulas—essentially burning a hole in the rectum. Only in select cases (using focal therapies or highly targeted salvage approaches) is re-radiation considered.
• Precision vs. Coverage: Some therapies focus narrowly on the prostate itself (e.g., CyberKnife), while others also treat surrounding areas (e.g., pelvic lymph nodes via EBRT), which may be more appropriate for high-risk cases.
• Treatment duration and convenience: Options like CyberKnife finish in days, while others like EBRT/IMRT span several weeks.
• Long-term data: Not all treatments, especially newer or more targeted ones, have extensive long-term outcome data—especially in high-risk cases.

---

What Is EBRT?

External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) is a general term for any radiation delivered from a machine outside the body aimed at the prostate (and possibly nearby tissues). Traditional EBRT is typically delivered over 6–8 weeks. It can treat not just the prostate but also the surrounding pelvic lymph nodes, which is often critical in high-risk cases. This wider net improves the chance of catching micrometastatic disease (tiny, undetectable cancer spread beyond the gland) that would not necessarily be picked up on a PET scan.

• Why It Matters: Een one or two rogue cancer cells outside the prostate can seed recurrence. A treatment which targets only the prostate, would miss these.
• Imaging & Technology: EBRT plans are developed using CT scans and sometimes MRI to map the prostate and nearby organs.
  
  Two major types of EBRT include:

---

1. IMRT –

A refined form of EBRT that modulates the intensity of radiation beams.

IMRT uses a machine called a LINAC (Linear Accelerator) that moves around your body, adjusting the shape and intensity of the radiation beams in real time to precisely dose your prostate while sparing nearby tissues like the bladder and rectum.

Why IMRT requires more sessions than SBRT:
IMRT delivers smaller doses per treatment (called “fractions”) to reduce toxicity to healthy tissues. This is safer for surrounding organs, especially when the radiation field includes nearby lymph nodes or pelvic structures.

• Pros: Excellent for high-risk cancer; can treat pelvis and prostate together; established long-term data; lower risk of collateral damage.
• Cons: Typically requires daily treatment over 6–8 weeks.

But here’s a critical nuance:
Not all IMRT systems are created equal.

➤ What Makes One IMRT System Better Than Another?

Standard LINACs (Linear Accelerators) deliver IMRT but may lack real-time tracking. That means while the radiation is shaped precisely, the machine doesn’t adapt in real time to small movements of your prostate—something that can happen even from gas, bladder filling, or rectal pressure.

Advanced LINAC-based platforms, however, bridge that gap:

• TomoTherapy® Hi-Art® (which you were treated on) combines IMRT with daily CT image guidance, delivering treatment in a spiral (helical) fashion and recalibrating based on the position of the prostate.
  • If the prostate shifts, the system can pause treatment and realign, which is exactly why your sessions sometimes stopped for realignment.
  • This adaptive capability narrows the precision gap between IMRT and CyberKnife, though the dosing philosophy remains different: IMRT spreads out the radiation over more sessions, using smaller daily doses to minimize long-term side effects.

2. CyberKnife – A Type of SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy)

A form of EBRT that delivers high-dose radiation in just five sessions.

CyberKnife is a robotic radiation system that uses image guidance to track the prostate’s movement in real time (e.g., as you breathe or your bladder fills). Unlike a LINAC, it doesn’t need a fixed gantry—it can fire from many more angles with submillimeter accuracy.

Why CyberKnife needs fewer sessions:
Because it can deliver extremely high doses with extreme precision and adaptive tracking, it reduces the need for multiple smaller fractions. However, the flip side is that healthy tissue has less time to recover between treatments.

• Pros: Precision minimizes dose to nearby tissue; far more convenient.
• Cons: Not widely used for high-risk cases; may miss cancer outside the prostate.

Are side effects worse with CyberKnife?
Studies suggest SBRT like CyberKnife may carry a slightly higher risk of urinary or rectal irritation—not necessarily due to inferior safety, but because of the intense dose per session. However, real-world differences are small when treatment is properly planned.

---

---

Brachytherapy – Radiation from Within

This internal radiation technique implants radioactive seeds directly into the prostate. It can be done as LDR (Low-Dose Rate) over weeks or HDR (High-Dose Rate) in one or more intense sessions.

• Often used with IMRT in high-risk cases to boost effectiveness.
• Drawbacks include the need for anesthesia, risk of urinary retention, and less availability in certain regions.

Final Thoughts: Which Way Should You Go?

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but here’s a helpful framing question:

“Do I want to target just the prostate, or do I want to cast a wider net?”

• If your cancer is low- or intermediate-risk, CyberKnife may be a compelling option: highly targeted, very convenient, and effective.
• If your cancer is high-risk, IMRT or EBRT (possibly combined with brachytherapy) is often a better choice due to its ability to treat both the prostate and potential regional spread.

---

Summary of Radiation Treatment Options